I answered a couple of questionnaires recently that revealed
much about me and my learning style. Oxford’s Strategy
Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) revealed the kinds of strategies
I typically use for language study http://richarddpetty.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/sill-english.pdf
. I answered the questions based on my
typical language-learning strategies and experiences over the years. From a scale of low (1.0-2.4), medium
(2.5-3.4), and high (3.5-5.0), my scores ranged from a medium 2.8 in “remembering
more effectively” to a high of 4.0 in “compensating for missing knowledge.” Frankly though, I think that the section on
“remembering more effectively” provided a limited selection of strategies that
did not necessarily match mine. In
general, this survey is an imperfect assessment of one’s strengths and
weaknesses in learning strategies, but it did make me ask myself some good
questions. Most importantly, there were
statements that I felt would make me a better language learner if I could
answer at least “usually true of me.”
For instance, “I start conversations in (target language),” “I try to
find as many ways as I can to use my (target language),” and “I look for people
I can talk to in (target language).” These
are language-learning strategies that I have not done enough of. Having to rate myself on these strategies,
force me to look at myself more honestly.
I take pride in my language-learning skills and strategies that come
easily to me, but I do have an aversion to the aforementioned areas that would
most likely improve my fluency. This
also has made me think about whether I am a member of a community of practice
of “good language learners” or a member of an “imagined community” as compared
in Kanno and Norton’s (2003) article “Imagined Communities and Educational
Possibilities: Introduction” http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0204_1.
Either way, I aim to practice “good
language learner” habits.
Language-learning
motivation: Perhaps, I am
motivated by the idea of being a good language learner. Since taking the SILL survey and gaining a
conscious awareness of my weaknesses, I have stepped out of my comfort zone this week and
instigated a conversation in Spanish with a native speaker. In imperfect Spanish, I told the speaker who
had observed my Zapotec materials that I was studying Isthmus Zapotec. I asked this person in Spanish if she knew
of anyone who spoke this language. She
told me "no," but she knew people from Guatemala who spoke another
indigenous language. The brief
conversation came to a natural close, but I pushed myself further to explain
that I had to use Spanish to study Isthmus Zapotec because my resources were
not in English. This was my excuse for
my motivation to practice speaking Spanish with this person, but, more
importantly, was something more I could say in Spanish.
Reid’s Perceptual
Learning-Style Preference Questionnaire http://lookingahead.heinle.com/filing/l-styles.htm
unsurprisingly told me that I was a visual learner. Learning styles identify the “individual
differences in information processing” (Nel, 2008, p. 49). These learning styles or preferences are
habitual and natural to every learner, aiding in the absorption, processing,
and retaining of new information. This
questionnaire looks at four different learning style preferences, visual,
auditory, kinesthetic, and tactile. I am
very visual in the regard that I remember what I have read or seen written on
any surface. According to Leaver et al
(2005), this makes me a visual verbalist.
In recalling information, I see words in my mind; but when this fails
me, I use pictorial images to remember things.
I am also a good auditory learner; however, I feel that I have more
control over remembering things through reading. I may only be able to hear something once,
but I can read information usually as often as needed. Know matter our personal learning
preferences, to be a good language learner, it is important to be flexible with
our learning style “to adapt to the needs of a given situation or task” (Nel,
2008, p. 53).
This questionnaire also made clear
that I prefer to work alone, and feel that I learn better through independent
study. This does not mean, however, that
I do not find value in working with a group.
There are different kinds of things to be learned in group study or
group research that cannot be learned alone.
When I work with a group, I adjust my priorities and goals to meet the
needs of the whole unit and individuals involved.
I love the connection you made to the reading on imagined communities. I would say very few people, even if they are good language learners, belong to a community of practice of good language learners, because good language learners don't typically get together in any kind of real community. Maybe our class would count as (a rare example of) such a community?
ReplyDelete